Happy Thursday, everyone.
I'm Frank Richardson, an organisational psychologist observing the workplace with curiosity and care. Each week, I share insights to help HR leaders better understand the people behind the processes and build cultures where both individuals and organisations can thrive.
We've got some exciting news to share!! It's Not the Work is now at over 500 newsletter recommendations on Beehiiv. Thank you all for reading and supporting us. If you haven't subscribed yet, please subscribe here.
Someone forwarded this? šSubscribeĀ to get it fresh, every Tuesday.
Missed an issue? š¬Catch up onĀ past essays.Ā
Curious what else weāre building? š”Insane Media livesĀ here.Ā
Want your campaign in front of our newsletterās community? šReach out here.
This week in workplace whiplash š
From layoffs dressed as AI to HR roles getting hollowed out, the work world is nudging toward chaos again.
š Sony launches new ācareer hubā to better tap global talent
Sonyās HR chief says the revamped careers portal gives applicants clearer visibility into culture, expectations, and process. Itās part of a bold push to improve talent access worldwide.
š HR Grapevineš§ Companies Are Blaming AI for Layoffs, but Itās Often Fear, Not Logic
Many firms are citing generative AI as the cause of firing rounds. But University of Cambridgeās Thomas Roulet argues the real driver is executives avoiding bad decisions in uncertain times.
Ā š Business Insiderš Entry-Level Workers Face AI āJob-Pocalypseā
As automation accelerates, businesses are favouring tech over junior roles. A Guardian live report notes 41% of firms have cut entry-level positions citing automation threats, deepening generational inequality.
Ā š The Guardianš¢ Lidl to Ax 130 HR & Recruitment Roles Pre-Christmas
The supermarket giant is centralising HR functions, putting 130 HR and recruitment positions at risk before the holiday season. Staff were blindsided; the move reflects deeper shifts in back-office strategy.
Ā š The Sun
After a week of layoffs, algorithms, and HR chaos, it feels fitting to look at another corporate ritual thatās starting to leave a headache⦠literally.
It was meant to be a āquick drink with the team.ā You know the one. Someone orders a round, someone else suggests shots, and suddenly the intern is giving a TED Talk about their ex. By morning, Slack is quiet and everyoneās pretending itās allergies, not regret.
According to research from the Institute for Public Policy Research, nearly one in three workers admitted calling in sick after drinking at work events, with pressure to ājoin inā especially high among younger staff. The report argues that office drinking culture (often framed as āteam bondingā) is quietly tanking productivity.
And while the British pub might take the blame, American offices arenāt far behind. From New York happy hours to startup āThirsty Thursdays,ā alcohol is still the default shortcut to connection⦠often leaving a mess for HR to clean up the next morning.
š¤ Supported by Leapsome
The 2026 Workforce Trends Report distills insights from 2,400 employees, managers, and HR leaders into practical strategies you can act on. Learn how to address disengagement behind retention, close critical skills gaps, enable AI adoption, and rebuild organizational trust. Stay ahead of whatās shaping HR in 2026 with research-backed guidance for People teams.
š§ The Behavioural Science Lens
The psychology behind workplace drinking isnāt about alcohol at all. Itās about belonging, pressure, and how easily norms take over.
Social proof and belonging: People donāt just drink; they copy. Behavioural science calls this social proof: the urge to mirror what everyone else is doing to signal belonging. The IPPR survey found that a quarter of employees felt pressured to drink to fit in, a classic case of group norms overruling individual preference.
The productivity illusion: Leaders often mistake short-term camaraderie for long-term engagement. A University of Bath study found that hangovers measurably impair attention, memory and reaction time the next day, while a BMJ Open review links alcohol use directly to absenteeism and presenteeism. Itās clear that hangovers donāt just hit morale, they affect performance too.
Exclusion disguised as inclusion: Whatās billed as āteam bondingā can quietly alienate those who donāt drink. The IPPR found that 28 percent of employees feel excluded by alcohol-centred events. And a qualitative study led by researchers at the University of Sussex found that non-drinkers often report social exclusion, stereotyping, and pressure to justify their choice (even in supposedly inclusive environments). Itās inclusion on paper but exclusion in practice.
The autonomy effect: Psychologists know that autonomy is a core driver of motivation and well-being. When participation in āfunā becomes expected, employees experience reactance: subtle resistance that lowers engagement. Voluntary fun builds culture, but forced fun will corrode it.
šWhat This Means for Leaders
Swap alcohol for autonomy. Let teams design their own socials instead of defaulting to drinks. When people have genuine choice, theyāre more likely to engage for the right reasons, not just to prove they āfit in.ā
Redefine āletting off steam.ā Harvard Business Review notes that forced fun rarely achieves its goal. True recovery happens when people can rest or connect on their own terms. That means offering flexible, low-pressure ways to unwind. Not scheduling āmandatory joy.ā
Track the hangover economy. If sick days or missed deadlines spike after social events, thatās a signal worth noticing. You canāt manage what you donāt measure, and culture costs are just as real as budget ones.
Make inclusion visible. Itās not about banning booze, itās about choice architecture. Ensure alcohol-free options look as appealing as the bar menu. Normalise skipping drinks without commentary. The quiet permission you create will speak volumes.
Challenge the āpub test.ā The āwould I grab a drink with them?ā question sounds harmless but itās a textbook example of affinity bias: the unconscious tendency to favour people who feel familiar or similar to us. When that becomes the metric for hiring or promotion, youāre rewarding comfort, not competence.
š¬ Final Thoughts
Workplace drinking has long been romanticised as a sign of a strong team, a reward after hard work, a way to let off steam. But when it becomes expected, it shifts from celebration to obligation. And thatās where culture starts to fray.
Team socials can still matter. Shared rituals build connection, but they donāt need to revolve around alcohol to do it. The goal is not to make work less fun, but to make it fairer, healthier, and a little more self-aware.
If the morning after a team night out feels more like damage control than team bonding, the problem probably isnāt just the booze. Itās how weāre defining belonging in the first place.
How's the depth of today's edition?
If something here speaks to you, Iād love to hear it.
Until next week,
Frank
P.S. If you want to get a feature about your own story, reply to this email. If youād like to reach our newsletter audience (founders, creators, and marketers), click the button below.
If youāre new here, Iām over the moon youāve joined us! To help me craft content thatās actually useful (and not just noise in your inbox), Iād love it if you took 1 minute to answer this quick survey below. Your insights help shape everything I write.
⨠Insane Media is more than one voice
š”Ā Dive into our other newsletters - where psychology meets the founders, creator economy, e-commerce marketing, and AI founders.







